• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Arbitration / Court Decisions / TEXAS STATE APPELLATE COURT UPHOLDS TEXAS WINDSTORM INSURANCE ASSOCIATION’S RIGHT TO PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF

TEXAS STATE APPELLATE COURT UPHOLDS TEXAS WINDSTORM INSURANCE ASSOCIATION’S RIGHT TO PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF

September 23, 2008 by Carlton Fields

The Texas legislature created the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association (“the Association”) as a means of providing property insurance to homeowners in certain areas at elevated risk of hurricane damage. The Association’s membership consists of all property insurers authorized to do business by Texas’ department of insurance. The Association is run by a board of directors made up of member representatives nominated to the board by the office of public insurance counsel, and the Association’s board in turn reports to the Texas commissioner of insurance. Notably, the Court listed some of the powers of the board, as set forth in its plan of operation appearing in the Texas Administrative Code, which powers include “assuming reinsurance from and ceding reinsurance to members, and purchasing reinsurance on behalf of members” (though the Association’s reinsurance rights and obligations were not at issue).

The Association became engaged in an appraisal dispute with homeowners to whom it issued a policy, and whose property was damaged by Hurricane Rita. In seeking to clarify its obligations under the policy, the Association filed a petition for declaratory relief in state court. The homeowners challenged the Association’s capacity to sue, asserting that the power to sue was not enumerated among the enumerated powers in the governing statutes and regulations. The Court rejected that argument, finding that, inherent in the Association’s general power to “perform all other duties reasonably necessary to accomplish the purpose” of its authorizing statute, was the power to seek resolution of inevitable disputes in Texas’ courts. Texas Windstorm Insurance Association v. Poole, No. 07-07-0061-CV (Tex. App. 7th Dist. 2008).

This post written by John Pitblado.

Filed Under: Arbitration / Court Decisions, Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.