• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Reinsurance Regulation / STATE SURPLUS LINES LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS

STATE SURPLUS LINES LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS

March 15, 2011 by Carlton Fields

There are two competing proposals to implement the Dodd-Frank Act’s provisions relating to nonadmitted insurance, which are found in the Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Reform Act of 2010 (“NRRA”) (Title V, Subtitle B Part I of the Dodd-Frank Act).  One proposal, called the “Surplus Lines Insurance Multistate Compliance Compact” or SLIMPACT, was created by the National Conference of Insurance Legislators, and has been endorsed by the Council of State Governments (“CSG”) and the National Conference of State Legislatures (“NCSL”).  The other proposal, called the “Nonadmitted Insurance Multi-State Agreement” or NIMA, was created by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”).  While the NAIC’s NIMA is basically limited to the allocation of nonadmitted insurance premium taxes, NCLOI’s SLIMPACT covers other issues relating to nonadmitted insurance as well as the allocation of premium taxes.

Since our posting of February 10, 2011, there are at least 21 States that have proposed surplus lines insurance legislation to conform to the NRRA.

Among the States that have introduced SLIMPACT or legislation authorizing the commissioner to enter into SLIMPACT:

  • Indiana — SB 578 (passed by Senate on 2/22/2011)
  • Kansas — SB 206 / SB 178
  • Kentucky — HB 167
  • Maryland — HB 911 / SB 694
  • New Mexico — SB 250 (passed by Senate on 3/4/2011
  • North Dakota — HB 1123 (passed by House on 2/14/2011)
  • Rhode Island — HB 5110 / SB 88
  • Tennessee — HB 966 / SB 1025
  • Texas — HB 1535
  • Vermont — HB 164 / S 36

Among the States that have introduced NIMA or reference NIMA:

  • Florida — HB 1227 / SB 1816
  • West Virginia — HB 2963 / SB 435

Among the States that have introduced both SLIMPACT and NIMA legislation:

  • Connecticut — SB 50 / HB 6363 (SLIMPACT) / SB 975 (NIMA)

Among the States that have introduced surplus lines legislation authorizing the commissioner to enter into a compact or multistate agreement without specifying either SLIMPACT or NIMA:

  • Arizona — HB 2112 (passed by House on 2/17/2011)
  • California – AB 315
  • Hawaii — HB 1052 / SB 1279 (HB 1052 passed by House 3/8/2011; SB 1279 passed by Senate on 3/8/2011)
  • New Hampshire — HB 424
  • Oklahoma — HB 2073 / SB 959 (SB 959 passed by Senate on 3/7/2011)
  • South Dakota — HB 1030 (adopted and signed by the Governor on 2/17/2011
  • Utah — HB 316 (adopted on 3/11/2011)
  • Wyoming — HB 242 (adopted and signed by the Governor on 3/2/2011)

Among the States that have introduced surplus lines legislation, but do not address multistate tax compacts or agreements:

  • California — SB 716
  • Nebraska — LB 70

Meanwhile, CSG, NCSL and NCOIL sent a letter to Congress requesting a one year extension of the effective date of the NRAA, to allow states more time to adopt legislation to conform to the NRRA and prevent state loss of critical insurance premium tax dollars.

This post written by Karen Benson.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.