• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Reinsurance Regulation / REINSURANCE COLLATERAL, CREDIT AND SURPLUS LINES REGULATORY UPDATE

REINSURANCE COLLATERAL, CREDIT AND SURPLUS LINES REGULATORY UPDATE

December 6, 2010 by Carlton Fields

There has been a flurry of activity on the regulatory front on a variety of issues that the Dodd-Frank Act deferred to the states:

  • The New York Department of Insurance has approved a reinsurance collateral regulation (effective 1/1/2011) which is somewhat similar to Florida’s regulation. The Department’s final review of comments submitted on the proposed regulation is also available. We will post a Special Focus piece on this new regulation soon.
  • The NAIC: (1) has reinsurance collateral recommendations pending, which are being framed as accreditation issues; (2) has a proposal under consideration for a surplus lines interstate compact; and (3) may consider amendments to the model acts and regulations regarding reinsurance credit. According to some media reports, there has been some disagreement within the NAIC as to the scope of the NAIC’s surplus lines initiative, with some states seeking to limit the scope to premium tax issues and a larger number seeking to broaden the scope to cover other areas of surplus lines operation mentioned in Dodd-Frank. The proponents of the narrower premium tax only approach apparently are prevailing
  • NCOIL recently approved a proposal addressing various surplus lines issues, but has not been active on the reinsurance collateral issue. Unlike the relatively narrow NAIC approach, NCOIL’s surplus lines proposal addresses not only premium tax issues, but also other issues, including some related to eligibility, brokerage and placement activities.

This post written by Rollie Goss.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.