• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Reinsurance Regulation / POST-DODD-FRANK REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS

POST-DODD-FRANK REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS

September 13, 2010 by Carlton Fields

The implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act (“DFA”) is underway with a flurry of rulemaking and other activity.

NAIC and state actions

Although the DFA did not include any significant requirements with respect to reinsurance collateral requirements, it did include a provision prohibiting states from denying credit for reinsurance if the domiciliary state of the ceding insurer recognizes such credit under certain circumstances. In light of the NAIC’s prior Reinsurance Regulatory Modernization Act (“RRMA”), which is the subject of prior blog entries, this DFA provision, Florida’s existing reinsurance collateral reduction provision (69O-144.007) and the perceived interest of states in moving forward with “individual state-based reinsurance collateral reduction reforms,” the NAIC’s Financial Regulation Standards and Accreditation Committee has made an “informal request” to the Reinsurance Task Force “to consider which key elements of the [NAIC’s RRMA] should be considered in reviewing any individual state initiates, and whether these key elements should be incorporated into the Credit for Reinsurance Model Law and Regulation.” An initial draft recommendation has been exposed for comment, with the comment period expiring September 16, 2010. This document contains many similarities to the Florida regulation, and specifically cites to the Florida regulation. Meanwhile, the New York Insurance Department has published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for proposed amendments to New York’s reinsurance collateral requirements. A summary and impact statement for the proposed New York amendment have been published. It appears that rather than promoting uniform collateral reform, the NAIC will be permitting state-by-state variations with some form of guidance.

On another front, at its 2010 Summer Meeting last month, the NAIC’s Executive Committee formed a special task force to consider the issues relating to surplus lines premium taxes raised by the DFA.

Federal actions

As the Office of National Insurance Office and the Financial Stability Oversight Council are being organized, one point of interest for those in the reinsurance and insurance industries is the rulemaking with respect to swaps and other financial products. The principal focal points of those efforts are the SEC and the CFTC. The SEC has issued a press release concerning its comment process and the CFTC and the SEC have published their comment topic lists and schedules. In addition, the CFTC and SEC held a joint swap roundtable.

This post written by Rollie Goss.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.