• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe

Motion to transfer venue in reinsurance case denied

June 6, 2006 by Carlton Fields

The United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri denied a motion by a defendant/reinsured to transfer venue of a case involving reinsurance claims, finding that the movant had not made a clear showing that the balance of interests weighed in favor of transfer. Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. Mass. Mutual Life Ins. Co., No. 06-0188 (May 4, 2006).

Filed Under: Arbitration / Court Decisions

UK Court of Appeals speaks on the materiality standard for contract avoidance

June 6, 2006 by Carlton Fields

In North Star Shipping Ltd v Sphere Drake Insurance Plc, [2006] EWCA Civ 378 (April 7, 2006), the UK Court of Appeals stated that when a party seeks to avoid insurance on the basis of the non-disclosure of a “material circumstance,” a material circumstance “is one that would have an effect on the mind of a prudent insurer in estimating the risk and it is not necessary that it should have a decisive effect on his acceptance of the risk or the amount of premium to be paid.” Id., paragraph 18.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Avoidance, UK Court Opinions

Stay of confirmation of arbitration award due to insolvency denied

June 6, 2006 by Carlton Fields

In Century Indemnity Company v. Paladin Reinsurance Corp., Civil Action No. 05-3755, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the Court denied a motion to stay the confirmation of an arbitration award on equitable or prudential grounds, due to the insolvency of the party against which the award had been entered. The Court rejected the arguments that confirmation would provide the holder of the award an unfair advantage over other creditors, or that confirmation would interfere with ongoing regulatory proceedings before the New York Insurance Department.

Filed Under: Arbitration Process Issues

Finite Reinsurance Case Development

April 25, 2006 by Carlton Fields

The Court hearing a criminal case involving finite reinsurance transactions involving American Internaitonal Group and General Reinsurance has granted a motion to transfer the case from the Eastern District of Virginia to the District of Connecticut. United States v. Ferguson, et al., Criminal Action No. 1:06-33, in the Untied States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (April 10, 2006).

Filed Under: Arbitration / Court Decisions

The future of the reinsurance and international financial markets

April 4, 2006 by Carlton Fields

Executive summary of a report issued by the Group of Thirty on issues facing the reinsurance and international financial markets. This report covers issues such as systemic risks, securitizations, transparency of the market and the regulatory environment. The Group of Thirty is composed of senior officers of insurance companies, banks, international economic associations, Central Banks, academics and others. The full copy of the Report is available for purchase through the Web site.

Filed Under: Reinsurance-Related Court Links

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 666
  • Page 667
  • Page 668
  • Page 669
  • Page 670
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 677
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.