• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe

Swiss Re completes acquisition of GE Insurance Solutions

July 6, 2006 by Carlton Fields

Swiss Reinsurance Co. has completed its acquisition of the property/casualty operations of GE Insurance Solutions in a deal that creates the world's largest reinsurer. The announced purchase price was $7.4 billion. (See the June 12, 2006 news release in the investor relations/news release section of Swiss Re's Internet site for details)

Filed Under: Reinsurance News Links

Choice of law for reinsurance of commercial general and professional liability insurance

July 6, 2006 by Carlton Fields

When a dispute arose over reinsurance for commercial general and professional liability insurance, and the reinsurance agreements were silent as to choice of law, a United States District Court has held that the choice of law provisions of the law of the forum state of the court control choice of law issues. ERC v. Laurier, case no. 03-1650, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (June 16, 2006).

Filed Under: Reinsurance Claims

Article on reinsurance coverage with respect to multi-year policies

July 5, 2006 by Carlton Fields

Daniel J. Neppl, Reinsurance Coverage for “Annualized” Loss Presentations Under Multi-Year Policies: “follow the fortunes” or Bellafonte?, Coverage, vol. 16, no. 3 at 1 (ABA Litigation Section Committee on Insurance Coverage Litigation May/June 2006).

Filed Under: Follow the Fortunes Doctrine, Law Review Articles About Reinsurance

Whether compliance with statute of limitation is condition precedent to arbitration up to arbitrators

July 5, 2006 by Carlton Fields

A United States District Court in Texas has held that whether compliance with a statute of limitation is a condition precedent to the commencement of arbitration should be decided by arbitrators, not the court. Vesta Fire Insur. Corp. v. ERC, case no. 05-2404 (N.D. Tex. May 31, 2006).

Filed Under: Arbitration Process Issues

UK scheme of arrangement binding on non-UK insurers

July 5, 2006 by Carlton Fields

A UK judge has ruled that he has jurisdiction over non-UK insurance companies to administrer and complete the runoff of a Willis Group-managed insurance/reinsurance pool under the UK's scheme of arrangement process. In re Sovereign Marine, [2006] EWHC 1335 (High Court Chancery Division June 9, 2006).

Filed Under: Jurisdiction Issues, UK Court Opinions

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 661
  • Page 662
  • Page 663
  • Page 664
  • Page 665
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 677
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.