• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe

UK Court finds lack of authority for reinsurance agreement

July 14, 2006 by Carlton Fields

The UK Commercial Court has held that a reinsurer is not bound by a contract signed by an agent, supposedly on its behalf, due to the lack of authority to do so, rejecting contentions that the agent had ostensible authority to do so, or that the reinsurer had ratified the contract. ING Re (UK) Limited v. R & V Versicherung AG, [2006] EWHC 1544 (Commercial Court June 29, 2006).

Filed Under: Contract Formation, UK Court Opinions

Glossary of reinsurance terms

July 10, 2006 by Carlton Fields

If you are wondering about the meaning of a particular term or phrase, try the glossary of reinsurance terms, presented by the Internet site captive.com.

Filed Under: Industry Background

Insurance Journal

July 10, 2006 by Carlton Fields

Insurance Journal provides daily news in the insurance and reinsurance industries.

Filed Under: Reinsurance News Links

Hartford and Equitas reach settlement

July 7, 2006 by Carlton Fields

Hartford Financial Services Group announced that it had reached an agreement with Equitas, Ltd. to resolve long-pending disputes regarding Hartford's ceded and assumed domestic reinsurance exposures with Equitas. Terms of the agreement were not disclosed.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Claims

NAIC proposes scrapping full collateral requirement for reinsurers

July 6, 2006 by Carlton Fields

The NAIC has begun to consider a proposal to scrap the “full collateral” requirement imposed upon non-US reinsurers. See the article about the recent NAIC meeting

Filed Under: Reinsurance News Links

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 660
  • Page 661
  • Page 662
  • Page 663
  • Page 664
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 677
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.