• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe

Court bars run-off administrator from arbitration

November 14, 2006 by Carlton Fields

National Indemnity Company provided reinsurance to Seaton Insurance Company and Stonewall Insurance Company, both of which were in run-off. Castlewood, Inc. entered into an agreement with Seaton and Stonewall to provide administratrive services for the run-off of their business. When arbitrations commenced between NICO and Seaton and Stonewall on their reinsurance agreements, NICO sought to add Castlewood to the arbitrations, despite the lack of an arbitration agreement in Castlewood's agreements with Seaton and Stonewall. The Court granted Castlewood's request for a preliminary injunction preventing its addition to the arbitrations, subject to a $1 million injunction bond. Castlwood, Inc., v. National Indemnity Co., Case No. 06-6842 (USDC S. D. N.Y. Oct. 24, 2006). NICO sought to compel Castlewood to arbitrate based upon theories of assumption and estoppel, and because Castlewood's agreement provided that its administration of the run-off would not conflict with the reinsurance obligations of Seaton and Stonewall. The Court found this an insufficient basis to compel Castlewood's participation in arbitration.

Filed Under: Arbitration Process Issues, Week's Best Posts

RICO claims against Gen Re dismissed in ROA case

November 13, 2006 by Carlton Fields

A US District Court has dismissed RICO claims asserted in a Second Amended Complaint against Gen Re (with leave to amend) arising out of the insolvency of Reciprocal of America, and Gen Re's provision of “accommodation reinsurance” that involved an undisclosed side agreement. The Court found a failure to appropriately plead proximate cause and reliance. State law claims were dismissed without prejudice since the only federal law claims were dismissed. In re Reciprocal of America Sales Practices Lit., MDL 1551 (USDC W. D. Ten. Sept. 29, 2006).

Filed Under: Accounting for Reinsurance, Reorganization and Liquidation

New York AG pressuring companies not to pay employees' attorneys fees

November 13, 2006 by Carlton Fields

New York AG (now Governor-elect) Eliot Spitzer has been obtaining provisions in settlement agreements with financial institutions that have been targets of investigations by his office prohibiting the organizations from paying the attorneys fees of employees who face criminal charges. A September 26 post in this blog reported on the criticism by a US District Judge of a similar practice by the Justice Department in criminal proceedings against former partners and employees of KPMG. It will be interesting to see whether this practice spreads to finite reinsurance investigations.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation

New York AG pressuring companies not to pay employees’ attorneys fees

November 13, 2006 by Carlton Fields

New York AG (now Governor-elect) Eliot Spitzer has been obtaining provisions in settlement agreements with financial institutions that have been targets of investigations by his office prohibiting the organizations from paying the attorneys fees of employees who face criminal charges. A September 26 post in this blog reported on the criticism by a US District Judge of a similar practice by the Justice Department in criminal proceedings against former partners and employees of KPMG. It will be interesting to see whether this practice spreads to finite reinsurance investigations.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation

Florida Department adopts new regulations for financing of Hurricane Catastrophe Fund

November 10, 2006 by Carlton Fields

The Florida Office of Insurance has adopted new regulations providing for the issuance of bonds to help finance the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 638
  • Page 639
  • Page 640
  • Page 641
  • Page 642
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 677
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.