• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Reinsurance Regulation / NEW HAMPSHIRE BILL AMENDS CREDIT FOR REINSURANCE LAWS

NEW HAMPSHIRE BILL AMENDS CREDIT FOR REINSURANCE LAWS

June 21, 2016 by Carlton Fields

New Hampshire recently amended its credit for reinsurance laws for domestic ceding insurers, revising RSA § 405:47 as follows:

“No credit under this section shall be allowed, as an admitted asset or deduction from liability, to any ceding insurer for reinsurance, unless the reinsurance contract provides, in substance, that in the event of the insolvency of the ceding insurer, the reinsurance shall be payable by the assuming insurer on the basis of the claims allowed against the ceding insurer in the insolvency proceedings, under contract or contracts reinsured, without diminution because of the insolvency of the ceding insurer…”

Specific exceptions to the above include so-called cut-through arrangements (where the reinsurer/assuming insurer assumes a domestic cedent’s policy obligations to direct insured(s)) or where the reinsurance agreement expressly provides for another payee of such reinsurance in the event of the insolvency of the cedent. The revised statute further provides that a reinsurance contract may require that the “domiciliary liquidator or receiver” of any insolvent cedent provide written notice to the reinsurer within a specific or reasonable period of time of any claim implicating the reinsurance that is filed in court or with the liquidator/receiver. If, during the pendency of the claim, a reinsurer seeks to investigate the claim and interpose certain defenses on the cedent’s behalf, the reinsurer can intervene in the proceeding in which the claim is pending and assert certain defenses unless barred by the applicable reinsurance agreement. The expenses incurred by the reinsurer in these situations are payable up to the amount of the expenses or amount of the “benefit produced”, whichever is less, as expenses of the receivership. The revised statute has an effective date of July 26, 2016. N.H. HB 1403, Ch. 144, May 27, 2016.

This post written by Rob DiUbaldo.
See our disclaimer.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.