At the November 17, 2014 meeting of the Valuation of Securities Task Force of the NAIC’s Financial Condition (E) Committee, a proposal was received from the North American CRO [Chief Risk Officers] Council to modify the capital treatment for catastrophe bonds held by life insurance companies, to encourage life insurance companies to purchase cat bonds. A slide presentation accompanied the proposal. The proposal contended that a revised RBC treatment for cat bonds might have the following benefits:
- property and casualty insurers would benefit from a larger and more stable source of capital, thereby reducing their cost of capital;
- life insurers would benefit from improved risk-adjusted asset returns as natural catastrophe risk and systemic investment risk are largely uncorrelated and, as a result, can provide a diversification benefit;
- a lower cost of capital for property and casualty insurers could improve the availability and affordability of insurance products, thereby benefiting property and casualty customers;
- life insurance customers would benefit from improved risk-adjusted returns; and
- regulators’ solvency concerns would diminish as greater diversification is introduced into the system.
The task force exposed this proposal for comment for a sixty day period expiring January 16, 2015. It is not clear whether the Task Force will revisit this proposal at its March meeting.
This post written by Rollie Goss.
See our disclaimer.