• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Reinsurance Regulation / LEGISLATIVE UPDATE

LEGISLATIVE UPDATE

August 22, 2007 by Carlton Fields

Many state legislatures have ended their session, and following is an update on a number of reinsurance-related bills previously reported in this blog:

  • captives:  There has been a good deal of activity on the captive front, and there have been a number of articles in the trade press about domestic jurisdictions attempting to become more competitive with each other and with off-shore locations.  Hawaii has enacted general changes in HB 272 (effective July 1, 2007), allowing captives to be licensed as limited liability companies and changing tax, capital and surplus rules.  Delaware has amended its statutes (HB 214, signed July 18, 2007) to allow special purpose financial captives, with new minimum capital requirements for such entities.  Missouri has enacted legislation (SB 215, effective August 28, 2007) which provides for the formation of captive insurance companies.
  • alternative financing:  Maine has allowed the edtablishment of special purpose reinsurance vehicles to facilitate the securitization of insurance risks.  LD 1390, effective June 21, 2007.
  • reinsurance placement:  New Hampshire has adopted rules (HB 782, effective January 1, 2008) clarifying its law with respect to reinsurance intermediaries, brokers and managers.  Texas has proposed modifying its provisions relating to the placement of reinsurance with an unauthorized reinsurer.  SB 1136, pending – see page 247 of 409.
  • credit for reinsurance:  Connecticut has amended its regulations relating to credit for reinsurance with respect to the assets of a single beneficiary trust, effective May 30, 2007.
  • health reinsurance:  Oregon has enacted provisions, effective June 25, 20007 (SB 183) making emergency provisions for a reinsurance program for medical progessional liability insurance policies provided by the state's Accident Insurance Fund.
  • voluntary restructuring:  Rhode Island continues to legislate in the area of voluntary restrcturing of solvent insurers, expanding the definition of commercial run-off insurer effective July 6, 2007 to include a Rhode Island domestic insurer formed or re-activated for the purpose of entering into a voluntary restructuring.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.