• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Reinsurance Regulation / Legislative update

Legislative update

July 4, 2007 by Carlton Fields

In celebration of our nation's birthday (no, the blogmaster is not actually making this post on the 4th), here is a review of what our various legislators are doing with respect to reinsurance. With respect to pending legislation:

  • The Governor of Nebraska signed LB 117 into law on May 30, 2007, which contains amendments to the Suprlus Lines Insurance Act and a new Captive Insurers Act (sections 35-53). The terms of this new act may vary from a different captive bill introduced that was profiled in a January 29 post to this blog.
  • The Governor of South Carolina, on June 14, signed S. 589, which makes amendments to the captive provisions of the South Carolina Code.
  • On June 11, the Governor of South Carolina signed H. 3820, the Omnibus Coastal Property insurance Reform Act of 2007, which provides credits to property owners and insurers, establishes various associations and damage mitigation programs and provides for the formation of Coastal Captive Insurance Companies.
  • The Governor of Vermont, on May 25, signed S. 91 into law, which makes amendments to the captive provisions of the Vermont Code, adding provisions relating to special purpose financial captive companies.

With respect to pending legislation:

  • Delaware HB 214 passed the state House on June 26, providing amendments to Delaware's captive insurance provisions.
  • A potentially interesting risk pool concept was introduced in Louisiana House Concurrent Resolution No. 175, which seeks an investigation of the feasibility of establishing a regional cat fund that would allow Gulf Coast states to pool property insurance risks and other resources as a method of reducing insurance premiums.
  • LD 1390 was introduced into the Maine legislature, providing for the establishment and regulation of special purpose reinsurance vehicles by insurers domiciled in Maine.
  • H 6503 was introduced into the Rhode Island General Assembly, providing for the establishment of a state commission on hurricane loss projection methodology.
  • In the US Congress, this term's version of the Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Reform Act (see the March 7, 2007 post to this blog) passed the House on a voice vote on June 26, and was sent to the Senate. The companion Senate bill has made no progress in committee. Last year, this bill passed the House late in the fall and was not considered by the full Senate before the end of the term.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.