• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Arbitration / Court Decisions / Interim or Preliminary Relief / COURT DENIES RECONSIDERATION OF RULING THAT REINSURER MUST POST PRE-PLEADING SECURITY

COURT DENIES RECONSIDERATION OF RULING THAT REINSURER MUST POST PRE-PLEADING SECURITY

May 24, 2016 by Carlton Fields

On April 13, 2016, we reported on Select Insurance Company’s successful motion for pre-pleading security against Excalibur Reinsurance Corp., pursuant to Connecticut law.  Excalibur filed a motion for reconsideration, which the Magistrate has now denied.  The court rejected on procedural grounds Excalibur’s new argument that, because Connecticut law did not deem Select Insurance Co. a Connecticut citizen, Select should not be permitted to invoke the Connecticut pre-pleading statute.  The court also rejected Excalibur’s citation to certain Connecticut case decisions as dicta.  The court concluded: “In the March 2016 Ruling, this Court held that the language of the Connecticut Security Statute does not address the citizenship of the moving party, nor is there Connecticut case law to the contrary; the Court relied on controlling law in this district in interpreting Connecticut’s Security Statute … and the wording of the Security Statute itself.  There is no basis for reconsideration of the March 2016 Ruling on these issues.”  Select Insurance Co. v. Excalibur Reinsurance Corp., Case No. 3:15-cv-00715 (D. Conn. May 10, 2016).

This post written by Joshua S. Wirth.
See our disclaimer.

Filed Under: Interim or Preliminary Relief, Week's Best Posts

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.