• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Arbitration / Court Decisions / Confirmation / Vacation of Arbitration Awards / COURT CONFIRMS INTERIM AWARD OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF BUT REFUSES TO CONFIRM NON-FINAL OPINION OF ARBITRATOR THAT ARBITRATION WAS BINDING

COURT CONFIRMS INTERIM AWARD OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF BUT REFUSES TO CONFIRM NON-FINAL OPINION OF ARBITRATOR THAT ARBITRATION WAS BINDING

August 18, 2016 by Carlton Fields

In a real estate broker commission dispute, the arbitrator had granted injunctive relief in favor of the plaintiff broker, ordering a percentage of the sale of certain real estate to be placed in an escrow account pending the outcome of the arbitration. The arbitrator had also suggested in an email to the parties, his belief that the arbitration proceeding was binding. The plaintiff then sought to confirm these two “awards.” Regarding the award of injunctive relief, the defendants contended that the arbitrator committed a manifest disregard of the law by misconstruing the legal standard for entry of an injunction. The court, however, confirmed the injunction award, finding that there was no record of the basis for the arbitrator’s injunction, and therefore the court could find no manifest disregard of the law. Regarding the arbitrator’s email stating that the arbitration would be binding, the court refused to confirm, holding that there were no formal orders or opinions memorializing that ruling. Bowers v. Northern Two Cayes Co. Ltd. Lighthouse Reef Resort Ltd., Case No. 1:15-cv-00029-MR-DLH (USDC W.D.N.C. July 7, 2016).

This post written by Joshua S. Wirth.

See our disclaimer.

Filed Under: Confirmation / Vacation of Arbitration Awards

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.