On November 19, 2007, we reported on the denial of a motion to dismiss an action seeking to bar the arbitration of disputes under 43 reinsurance contracts. A district judge has now compelled the production of documents in five categories, finding them relevant to both the claims alleged by Midwest Employers Casualty Company (“MECC”) and the defenses of Legion Insurance Company (“Legion”). The dispute is whether the reinsurance contracts provide for coverage on a “risk attaching” basis (Legion’s contention) or a “loss occurring” basis (MECC’s contention). The court compelled Legion to produce:
- Contracts evidencing reinsurance purchased by Legion for program business on a “loss occurring” basis;
- Documents evidencing the attachment basis of the reinsurance that Legion purchased from MECC;
- Documents showing Legion’s booking of or accounting for reinsurance purchased from MECC;
- Documents showing actuarial support for Legion’s last Schedule F statutory filing relating to its projection of MECC’s ultimate liability and any subsequent projection of MECC’s ultimate liability; and
- Documents showing case reserves and reinsurance receivables by claim, program and/or year relating to Legion’s policies or accounts reinsured by MECC or that otherwise show reinsurance payments that Legion estimated or expected to receive from MECC.
Further detail regarding the dispute is set forth in the memoranda in support of and in opposition to the Motion to Compel. Midwest Employers Casualty Company v. Legion Insurance Company, Case No. 07-870 (USDC E.D. Mo. June 4, 2008).
This post written by Rollie Goss.