• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Reinsurance Regulation / CFPB ISSUES FINAL RULE PROHIBITING CLASS ACTION WAIVER ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN CERTAIN CONSUMER FINANCIAL CONTRACTS

CFPB ISSUES FINAL RULE PROHIBITING CLASS ACTION WAIVER ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN CERTAIN CONSUMER FINANCIAL CONTRACTS

August 28, 2017 by Carlton Fields

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued a final rule on July 10, 2017, prohibiting providers of certain consumer financial products and services from including within consumer agreements a requirement that any future disputes that might otherwise be the basis of a class action to instead be arbitrated on an individual basis. The rule also requires providers to insert a provision into their arbitration agreements acknowledging this limitation. The rule is based on the Bureau’s finding that pre-dispute arbitration agreements “are being widely used to prevent consumers from seeking relief from legal violations on a class basis, and that consumers rarely file individual lawsuits or arbitration cases to obtain such relief.”

The final rule also requires providers that use pre-dispute arbitration agreements to submit records relating to arbitral and court proceedings to the Bureau. The rule applies to providers engaged in extending consumer credit, extending or brokering automobile leases, providing debt management or debt settlement services, providing assistance in avoiding foreclosure or modifying consumer credit, providing check cashing, collection or guaranty services, and collecting debt arising from any of these services, among other consumer services and products. The rule becomes effective September 18, 2017, and consumer agreements entered into as of March 19, 2018, must comply with the rule. 12 C.F.R. Part 1040 (July 10, 2017).

This post written by Benjamin E. Stearns.
See our disclaimer.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.