• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Archives for Week's Best Posts

Week's Best Posts

Winter 2007 Journal of Reinsurance

March 12, 2007 by Carlton Fields

The Winter 2007 issue of the Journal of Reinsurance is out. Published by the Intermediaries & Reinsurance Underwriters Association, articles in the current issue include:

  • Eugene Wollan, Reinsurance Arbitrations: it's all in the point of view;
  • John Gavin, IRMA Will Transform the Relationship Between Reinsurers and Receivers, about the NAIC's Insurer Receivership Model Act;
  • Frank Achert and Arthur White, Solvency II: preparing for the dawn of a new day, about solvency regulation changes in the European Union; and
  • Bina Dagar, The Reinsurance Underwriting Audit: an essential process.

Further information about the articles, and suscription information, may be found at the IRU's Internet site.

Filed Under: Law Review Articles About Reinsurance, Week's Best Posts

Surplus lines/reinsurance bill reintroduced in Congress

March 7, 2007 by Carlton Fields

Last fall, the Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Reform Act passed the house 417-0, but was not considered by the Senate due to its late passage in the House. A substantially similar bill has been introduced in the House, H.R. 1065. The bill subjects nonadmitted insurers to the premium tax laws of the policyholder's home state, and makes reinsurers subject to the solvency laws of their state of domicile under most circumstances. Due to an amendment to the definition of “qualified risk manager,” the new bill has the support of the Risk & Insurance Management Society, which did not support the bill last year.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Reorganization and Liquidation, Week's Best Posts

District Court vacates attorney fee award portion of arbitration award

March 6, 2007 by Carlton Fields

Following arbitration of a dispute between parties to a coinsurance arrangement, an arbitration panel awarded attorney and arbitrator fees and costs to one party. A District Court confirmed the award, but vacated the award of fees and costs, which exceeded three million dollars, concluding that the award exceeded the arbitrators’ powers. The court relied on the terms of the coinsurance agreements, which expressly stated that “[e]ach party shall bear the expense of its own arbitrator…and related outside attorneys’ fees.” The court held that despite the breadth of the agreements to arbitrate, these provisions made clear that the arbitrators had no authority to award outside attorneys’ fees. The Court's decision is reflected in an Order, and a Judgment, with additional information about the case available in Memoranda filed by Reliastar and EMC National Life. Reliastar Life Insurance Company of New York v. EMC National Life Insurance Company, No. 06-cv-10186 (S.D.N.Y., February 13, 2007).

Filed Under: Confirmation / Vacation of Arbitration Awards, Week's Best Posts

Tenth Circuit adopts arbitral immunity doctrine

March 1, 2007 by Carlton Fields

In an appeal from an award in an NASD-sponsored arbitration, the Tenth Circuit has joined virtually all other Circuits in recognizing that arbitrators, arbitral forums and arbitral sponsors are immune from liability for actions taken in connection with administering arbitration. Pfannenstiel v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Case No. 04-1274 (10th Cir. Feb. 20, 2007).

Filed Under: Arbitration Process Issues, Confirmation / Vacation of Arbitration Awards, Week's Best Posts

Hannover Re issues $106 million cat securitization

February 26, 2007 by Carlton Fields

Hannover Re has issued a $160 million securitization of catastrophe risks. Hannover described the issue as the completion of its “K3” transaction, being composed of a variety of non-proportional reinsurance of natural perils (hurricanes and earthquakes in the United States, windstorms in Europe and earthquakes in Japan) and worldwide aviation business.

Filed Under: Alternative Risk Transfers, Week's Best Posts

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 253
  • Page 254
  • Page 255
  • Page 256
  • Page 257
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 269
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.