Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

You are here: Home / Archives for Reinsurance Regulation

Reinsurance Regulation

LEGISLATIVE UPDATE

by

The following reinsurance-related legislation was recently proposed in federal and state legislative bodies:

  • On January 6, 2009, Senator John Kerry introduced S. 79, a bill to amend the Social Security Act to establish a federal reinsurance program for catastrophic health care costs proposing, among other things, to establish within the Department of Health and Human Services an office to be known as the “Office of Federal Reinsurance.” The bill was referred to the Committee on Finance.
  • That same day, Representative Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida introduced H.R. 83, to establish a program to provide reinsurance “for state natural catastrophe insurance programs to help the United States better prepare for and protect its citizens against the ravages of natural catastrophes, to encourage and promote mitigation and prevention for, and recovery and rebuilding from such catastrophes, and to better assist in the financial recover from such catastrophes.” The bill was referred to the Committee on Financial Services.
  • A bill has been introduced into the North Dakota Senate to amend and reenact portions of N.D. Code § 26.1-06.1-31, which deals with reductions in amounts recoverable by liquidators from reinsurers.
  • The Montana State Auditor requested House Bill No. 161, which was introduced to the Montana legislature to revise captive insurance laws, authorize the Insurance Commissioner to waive RBC reports for captive risk retention groups, clarify collection of the premium tax, change the calculation of the tax on direct premiums, and expand the scope of laws applicable to captive insurance companies.

This post written by Brian Perryman.

NAIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE REJECTS WORKING GROUP’S PROPOSALS

by

On Tuesday, January 27, 2009, this author attended the NAIC Capital and Surplus Relief Working Group public hearing in Washington, D.C. The Working Group met to discuss its draft recommendations on nine insurance industry proposals offered by the ACLI designed to provide capital and surplus relief on life insurers’ December 31, 2008 statutory financial statements. One proposal offered by ACLI requested that regulators allow insurers to utilize the 2001 CSO Preferred Mortality Tables for contracts based on the 2001 CSO Mortality Table and issued prior to the January 1, 2007 effective date on which the Mortality Tables were set to become applicable. The Technical Group assigned to consider this proposal expressed concern that some companies may already be addressing the overly conservative reserves through a questionable reinsurance accounting practice. The Technical Group recommended that Insurance Commissioners consider requiring companies to demonstrate that they have not used such reinsurance accounting practices before allowing the company to utilize the new Mortality Tables. Another proposal related to collateral for reinsurance transactions. After spirited discussion among regulators, industry representatives, and consumer advocates, the Working Group formally approved each of its prior draft recommendations and forwarded its recommendations to the NAIC Plenary Body.

On Thursday, January 29, the NAIC Executive Committee held a teleconference vote on the proposals forwarded by the Capital and Surplus Relief Working Group. The Executive Committee, in a near unanimous vote, rejected the Working Group’s recommendations noting that neither the ACLI nor any insurance company provided sufficient information to justify enacting these proposals on an emergency basis.

The Executive Committee concluded that NAIC Working and Technical groups should continue to provide feedback and guidance during the current financial crisis. The Committee commented that companies should continue to work with their state regulators to maintain sufficient capital, and that the NAIC was open to considering these issues again in the future. Read the NAIC's release on the action..

This post written by John Black.

TROUBLED FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURER RESTRUCTURES

by

CIFG Holding, Ltd., the holding company for CIFG's financial guaranty subsidiaries, has reached an agreement to commute approximately $12 billion in troubled credit swaps and reinsure $13 billion of municipal bonds. The transactions were announced in a press release by CIFG and a news release from the New York Insurance Department. According to New York Superintendent Eric Dinallo, the result will be that the bonds are novated to Assured Guaranty Corp., with the municipal bonds going from junk bond to highest investment grade rating, leaving CIFG as a solvent bond insurer in a position to pay claims on its remaining policies. The consideration for the transactions include cash payment and equity consideration. The result is a change in the controlling shareholders of CIFG, with changes in senior management expected.

This post written by Rollie Goss.

STATE REGULATORY RULINGS RELATING TO RISK POOLING TRUST AND TRIA

by

The New York State Insurance Department’s Office of General Counsel issued an opinion concluding that a New York domestic insurer may enter into a reinsurance agreement with an Illinois-based risk pooling trust and obtain credit for that reinsurance so long as the New York insurer holds funds provided by the trust in accordance with certain New York insurance law requirements. OGC Op. No. 08-10-02.

The Montana State Auditor’s office issued an advisory memorandum explaining how certain provisions in the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Extension Act of 2007 may require Montana insurers to submit a filing of the disclosure notices, policy language, and applicable rates. Advisory Memorandum.

This post written by Dan Crisp.

SECOND CIRCUIT AFFIRMS DISMISSAL OF INSUREDS’ CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST COUNTERCLAIM OVER REINSURANCE BANKRUPTCY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS

by

The “Ades” and “Berg” groups of investors (the “Ades Berg Group”), were parties who joined in the bankruptcy proceedings of the Bennett Funding Group, Inc. and related companies (the “Bennett Group”), based on claims that, among other things, the Bennett Group had defrauded them in an investment scheme. The Bennett Group was insured under a reinsurance contract issued by Sphere Drake Insurance PLC (“Sphere Drake”). A settlement was reached in the course of the bankruptcy proceedings between some groups of investors and Sphere Drake. As part of the settlement, Sphere Drake made some payments to certain parties, and held remaining policy proceeds for distribution to remaining parties in the bankruptcy.

Richard Breeden, as bankruptcy Trustee of the Bennett Group, asserted declaratory claims within the context of the bankruptcy proceeding against Sphere Drake and the Ades Berg Group pertaining to the distribution of unallocated policy proceeds. The Ades Berg Group asserted a counterclaim against Mr. Breeden, seeking the imposition of a constructive trust over any remaining insurance proceeds. Mr. Breeden sought dismissal of the counterclaim, arguing that the imposition of a constructive trust would inequitably interfere with his duties as Trustee to distribute proceeds to remaining debtors in accordance with applicable federal bankruptcy law. The bankruptcy court agreed, dismissing the counterclaim, with prejudice, based in part on principles embodied in the federal bankruptcy laws. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed, finding that the New York state law equitable principles urged by The Ades Berg Group did not conflict with the purposes of the federal bankruptcy laws, and that the bankruptcy court’s ruling thus did not run afoul of recent U.S. Supreme Court precedent cited by the Ades Berg Group, which reaffirmed the principle that constructive trusts should be determined with reference to state law. In re Ades and Berg Group Investors, No. 07-3464 (2d Cir. Dec. 16, 2008).

This post written by John Pitblado.