• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Archives for Reinsurance Regulation

Reinsurance Regulation

NAIC REDRAFTS REINSURANCE REGULATORY MODERNIZATION ACT

August 25, 2009 by Carlton Fields

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners recently published a revised version of its proposed Reinsurance Regulatory Modernization Act of 2009. We reported on the original version, but the July 27, 2009 edition of the bill includes several important changes. Highlights include:

  • Completely redrafting of the “Membership” portion of the bill, detailing the composition and purpose of the Reinsurance Supervision Review Board (Section 3);
  • Expanded the Board’s Home State and Port of Entry Standards as well as amending the Authority to Enter Agreements with Qualified Non-US Jurisdiction Supervisors (Section 4);
  • Inclusion of a section of the bill detailing the requirements for National and Port of Entry Reinsurers (Section 5);
  • An expanded section explaining Preemption of Inconsistent State Laws and Actions (Section 6);
  • A newly drafted Right of Review provision (Section7); and
  • An explanation of the Duties of Board (Section 9).

The NAIC also published a redlined version, showing the changes from the original version.

This post written by Brian Perryman.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE

August 17, 2009 by Carlton Fields

• On July 21, 2009, Florida Senators Bill Nelson and Mel Martinez introduced S. 1486, a bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the creation of disaster protection funds by property and casualty insurance companies for the payment of policyholders’ claims arising from future catastrophic events. The bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Finance.

• That same day, Florida Senators Bill Nelson and Mel Martinez introduced S. 1487, a bill that establishes a bipartisan commission on catastrophic disaster risk and insurance. The bill was referred to the House Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

• On July 30, 2009, Representative Richard E. Neal of Massachusetts introduced H.R. 3424, a bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow the deduction for excess non-taxed reinsurance premiums with respect to the United States risks paid to affiliates. The bill was referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

This post written by Karen Benson.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

ANTECEDENT DEBT IS “FAIR CONSIDERATION” FOR REINSURANCE CONTRACT

July 22, 2009 by Carlton Fields

The Rehabilitator of Frontier Insurance Company challenged a New York federal court to reconsider summary judgment rulings that dismissed claims against Everest Reinsurance Company. The Rehabilitator’s claims against Everest sounded in fraudulent conveyance on the theory that payments made to Everest under a reinsurance contract it issued to Frontier were not based on fair consideration because no risk was transferred under the contract. The Court had previously ruled that there was fair consideration due to an antecedent debt at the time the parties entered into the reinsurance contract. The Court allowed reconsideration, but upon review maintained its prior ruling. Mills v. Everest, Case No. 05-8928 (USDC S.D.N.Y. June 8, 2009). Further background to supplement the brief opinion is found in a related Memorandum of Law.

This post written by John Pitblado.

Filed Under: Contract Formation, Contract Interpretation, Reorganization and Liquidation

REINSURANCE REGULATION: STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE

July 13, 2009 by Carlton Fields

Following are selected bills in the reinsurance area that were recently introduced or adopted in the state or federal legislature:

• S. 5994 was recently introduced in the New York Senate to permit mortgage guaranty insurers to obtain credit for reinsurance in a manner conforming to the requirements prescribed by the Superintendent of Insurance. The bill was referred to the Rules Committee.
• Oregon enacted House Bill No. 2755 (mentioned in our May 8, 2009 post), which requires the Department of Consumer and Business Services to conduct a study of options available for utilizing reinsurance and other mechanisms for spreading risk in individual and small employer group health insurance markets and submit a report to the Legislative Assembly by December 1, 2010.
• A companion bill, S 1363, to H.R. 2571 (mentioned in the June 9, 2009 post) was introduced in the U.S. Senate. The bill proposes to streamline the regulation of non-admitted insurance and reinsurance, and it contains the same principal provisions addressed in H.R. 2571, which were described in our June 9, 2009 post. The bill was referred to the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee.

This post written by Karen Benson.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

SPECIAL FOCUS: NAIC’S REINSURANCE REGULATORY MODERNIZATION ACT

June 29, 2009 by Carlton Fields

The NAIC's Reinsurance Regulatory Modernization Act was supposed to be the solution for the problems surrounding the regulation of reinsurance and the role of collateral in reinsurance transactions. SPECIAL FOCUS Editor John Pitblado describes the critical comments received to the exposure draft of the proposed federal legislation, the consitutional issues involved and the current status of this initiative, in Constitutional Concerns with the Reinsurance Regulatory Modernization Act.

This post written by John Pitblado.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Special Focus, Week's Best Posts

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 72
  • Page 73
  • Page 74
  • Page 75
  • Page 76
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 107
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.