• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Archives for Reinsurance Regulation

Reinsurance Regulation

IAIS’S PROPOSED INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE SUPERVISION OUTLINE OPEN FOR COMMENT

July 13, 2011 by Carlton Fields

The International Association of Insurance Supervisors (“IAIS”) has released a “concept paper” describing its proposed Common Framework for the Supervision of Internationally Active Insurance Groups (“ComFrame”). This document is open for comments through August 31, 2011. As summarized in the accompanying Press Release, ComFrame will:

  • Develop methods of operating group-wide supervision of Internationally Active Insurance Groups in order to make group-wide supervision more effective and more reflective of actual business practices;
  • Establish a comprehensive framework for supervisors to address group-wide activities and risks and also establish principles for better supervisory cooperation in order to allow for a more integrated, international approach; and
  • Foster global convergence of regulatory and supervisory measures and approaches.

The IAIS also has published a set of presentation slides which provide an overview of ComFrame.

This post written by Rollie Goss.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

PRESIDENT APPOINTS INSURANCE EXPERT MEMBER OF FSOC

July 2, 2011 by Carlton Fields

President Obama has nominated Roy Woodall to fill the position designated for an insurance expert on the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”). An attorney, Mr. Woodall served as Kentucky Insurance Commissioner, was President of the National Association of Life Companies for 13 years prior to its merger with the American Council of Life Insurers (“ACLI”), and continued with the ACLI as managing director for issues and vice-president and chief counsel for state relations. He later served as a senior insurance policy analyst in the Treasury Department and as an insurance consultant for the Congressional Research Service. If confirmed by the Senate, Mr. Woodall would be the long-awaited insurance “expert” in the FSOC’s work, including its deliberations concerning the criteria for designating companies as systematically important financial institutions. There is no indication yet as to when the Senate Banking Committee might hold a confirmation hearing for Mr. Woodall. With the Congress embroiled in the issue of the national debt, and the Senate scheduled to be in recess until July 10, and from August 8 to September 5, it may be a while before Mr. Woodall actually joins in the work of the FSOC (assuming he is confirmed by the Senate).

This post written by Rollie Goss.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

TWO MORE BERMUDA-BASED REINSURERS PERMITTED TO OPERATE IN FLORIDA WITH REDUCED COLLATERAL AS AN “ELIGIBLE REINSURER”

June 1, 2011 by Carlton Fields

The Florida Office of Insurance Regulation (FOIR) has approved two more Bermuda-based reinsurance companies, Aspen Insurance Ltd. and AXIS Specialty Ltd., to become an “eligible reinsurer” under Florida law and thereby operate in Florida’s property catastrophe reinsurance market with reduced collateral. Ceding insurance companies may now receive full credit on their financial statements for their Aspen or AXIS Specialty property catastrophe reinsurance ceded without full collateral. These approvals bring to fourteen the number of reinsurance companies approved under this program. In re Aspen Insurance Ltd., Case No. 117338-11-CO (FOIR May 6, 2011) and In re AXIS Specialty Ltd., Case No. 117743-11-CO (FOIR May 23, 2011).

This post written by Michael Wolgin.

Filed Under: Accounting for Reinsurance, Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

RHODE ISLAND COURT APPROVES COMMUTATION OVER CHALLENGE TO CONSTITUTIONALITY

May 10, 2011 by Carlton Fields

GTE Reinsurance Company, in runoff since 1990, proposed a commutation plan regarding its remaining potential property-casualty related liabilities. The commutation plan is essentially a statutory “solvent scheme of arrangement.” Two of GTE’s cedents objected. One challenged Rhode Island’s Voluntary Restructuring of Solvent Insurers Act, G.L. 1956 § 27-14.5-1 as unconstitutional under the Contract Clause and Due Process Clause of the Rhode Island and federal Constitutions. The court rejected the challenges, crediting the large majority of cedents (34 out of 39) that voted in favor of the plan, and noting that, while some rights under the contracts between the objectors and GTE would be impaired by the commutation, they would not be “substantially impaired” – the standard for a contract clause challenge. The court also found the Act to have a legitimate public purpose, and to employ reasonable and necessary means to carry out that purpose. It rejected the due process argument for essentially the same reasons, noting that a “Contract Clause inquiry is more searching than the rational basis review employed in a due process challenge.” In re GTE Reinsurance Co. Ltd., No. PB 10-3777 (R.I. Super. Ct. Apr. 25, 2011).

This post written by John Pitblado.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

TWO ADDITIONAL BERMUDA REINSURERS ADMITTED UNDER FLORIDA’S REDUCED COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS

April 26, 2011 by Carlton Fields

Alterra Bermuda Limited and Arch Reinsurance Limited were both approved by Consent Order of the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation, to become the eleventh and twelfth reinsurers, respectively, admitted under Florida’s law allowing foreign reinsurers to post reduced collateral, upon demonstration that they are financially sound and highly rated by eligible ratings institutions. As set forth in the respective Orders, Alterra is a Bermuda-based reinsurer with capital and surplus in excess of $1.5 billion, and Arch is a Bermuda-based reinsurer with over $4.2 billion in capital and surplus. In re: Alterra Bermuda Limited, No. 115697-11-CO (Fla. O.I.R. March 23, 2011); In re: Arch Reinsurance Limited, No. 115570-11-CO (Fla. O.I.R. March 31, 2011).

This post written by John Pitblado.

Filed Under: Accounting for Reinsurance, Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 57
  • Page 58
  • Page 59
  • Page 60
  • Page 61
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 107
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.