• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Archives for Reinsurance Regulation

Reinsurance Regulation

SPECIAL FOCUS: THE COVERED AGREEMENT

February 20, 2017 by Carlton Fields

The United States and the European Union have agreed on the final wording of a Covered Agreement which covers several topics, including the provision of collateral by foreign reinsurers.  We discuss the Covered Agreement and the initial responses to the agreement in a Special Focus article.

This post written by Rollie Goss.
See our disclaimer.

Filed Under: Accounting for Reinsurance, Reinsurance Regulation, Special Focus, Week's Best Posts

HAWAII BILL PROPOSES PARAMETRIC DISASTER INSURANCE PILOT PROGRAM

February 7, 2017 by Rob DiUbaldo

On January 23, 2017, Hawaii lawmakers introduced a bill to establish a pilot parametric disaster insurance program aimed at preventing potential liquidity gaps between federal assistance and total economic losses in the event of a serious natural disaster. Parametric or index-based insurance programs peg claims to specific characteristics of natural disasters rather than the usual insurance arrangement basing payouts on actual losses sustained. The bill lists one example of a metric to determine whether coverage under a parametric disaster program would be triggered—if the maximum wind speed of a hurricane as it passes through a specific part of the islands reaches a certain threshold, coverage attaches.

If passed, H.B. 791 would establish a three-year parametric disaster insurance pilot program and empower the state to research and purchase parametric disaster insurance. A parametric disaster insurance special fund would be financed with interest earned on the principal in the currently existing hurricane reserve trust fund, any money paid out under parametric disaster insurance policies, and any appropriations made by the state legislature. The bill further requires a report to the legislature on the pilot program due by December 1, 2019, and calls for the repeal of the program on June 30, 2020. A companion bill, S.B. 799, was introduced in the state senate on January 20, 2017.

This post written by Thaddeus Ewald .

See our disclaimer.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

COMMUTATION, SETTLEMENT, AND RELEASE AGREEMENT OF THE HOME INSURANCE COMPANY APPROVED

February 2, 2017 by Michael Wolgin

A New Hampshire court has approved the commutation, settlement, and release agreement between The Home Insurance Company (in Liquidation) and Providence Washington Insurance Company (PWIC), as successor to Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, which merged with Seaton Insurance Company.

Home entered liquidation in 2003, and the New Hampshire Insurance Commissioner was appointed as Liquidator. Prior to the merger of PWIC with Seaton, the Liquidator entered into a separate commutation agreement effective March of 2015 as to all PWIC business. The instant commutation agreement (approved in December 2016), provides for the commutation of all of Home’s ceded and assumed business to/from Seaton (pre-merger), as well as resolution of all of Seaton’s contribution claims against Home (which related to increased payments Seaton made to insureds common to both parties as the result of Home’s insolvency). A redacted copy of the commutation agreement, with economic terms removed, was filed with Home’s motion for approval. In re Liquidation of The Home Insurance Co., 217-2003-EQ-00106 (N.H. Sup. Ct. Dec. 12, 2016) (order approving commutation); Motion for Approval (Oct. 18, 2016).

This post written by Brooke L. French.

See our disclaimer.

Filed Under: Reorganization and Liquidation

THE U.S. AND THE EUROPEAN UNION SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE NEGOTIATIONS FOR COVERED AGREEMENT

January 23, 2017 by John Pitblado

As we previously reported in June 2016, the United States and the European Union were in discussions to enter into a Covered Agreement. The Dodd-Frank Act introduced Covered Agreements as a means for limited federal intrusion into the regulation of the business of insurance and reinsurance by the states. On January 13, 2017, the U.S. Department of Treasury and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative announced that the negotiations between the United States and the European Union for a Covered Agreement were successfully completed. The text of the announcement can be found here.

Also, on January 13, 2017, the United States and the European Union released a joint statement announcing the successful negotiations. The statement noted that the Covered Agreement “will ensure ongoing robust insurance consumer protection and provide enhanced regulatory certainty for insurers and reinsurers operating in both the U.S. and the EU.”

The Covered Agreement covers three areas of prudential insurance oversight: 1) reinsurance; 2) group supervision; and 3) the exchange of insurance information between supervisors.  The Covered Agreement contains detailed provisions, which are summarized below.

  • Reinsurance collateral:  Covered Agreement is intended to enhance consumer protection and lead to the elimination of collateral for a ceding insurer to obtain credit for reinsurance and local presence requirements for EU and U.S. reinsurers operating in these markets.  To obtain this relief a reinsurer is required: (1) to maintain a stated minimum level of capital or surplus and a stated solvency ratio; (2) consent to jurisdiction in the ceding jurisdiction and the appointment of the supervisory authority of the ceding jurisdiction as an agent to accept service of process; (3) agree to pay any judgment obtained by the ceding insurer and provide 100% security for any final judgment liability it resists; (4) pay reinsurance claims promptly; and (5) confirm that it is not participating in a solvent scheme of arrangement and provide 100% collateral for the terms of any subsequent scheme.  States shall be encouraged to adapt their credit for reinsurance requirements to the Covered Agreement, and a determination will be made as to whether any state requirements are inconsistent and preempted within 60 months of the execution of the Covered Agreement.
  • Supervision:  U.S. and EU insurers operating in the other market will only be subject to worldwide prudential insurance group oversight by the supervisors in their home jurisdiction, including group governance, solvency, capital and a worldwide group Own Risk and Solvency Assessment.  Under the Agreement, supervisory authorities on both sides preserve the ability to request and obtain information about worldwide activities which could harm policyholders’ interests or financial stability in their territory.  This portion of the Covered Agreement is responsive to Congressional concerns that U.S. domiciled companies may be subjected to EU capital requirements.
  • Information exchange:  The Agreement also encourages insurance supervisory authorities in the United States and the EU to continue to exchange supervisory information on insurers and reinsurers that operate in the U.S. and EU markets. To support such information exchange, the Agreement includes model memorandum of understanding provisions.

The final legal text of the Covered Agreement was provided to Congress on January 13, 2017, in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act. According to the statement, the European Union will also follow the necessary steps to also sign and formally conclude the Agreement.  If there are any surprises in this agreement it may be the extended length of time for the implementation of the collateral reform provisions and the lack of any explicit consideration of the Solvency II equivalence requirement.

This post written by Rollie Goss.
See our disclaimer.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

COURT APPROVES DIRECT PAYMENT OF REINSURANCE TO INSURED IN RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY LIQUIDATION

January 19, 2017 by Rob DiUbaldo

The court handling the liquidation of Reliance Insurance Company has approved an application for the direct payment of reinsurance proceeds by United Insurance Company to Reliance’s insured, Hoechst Celanese Corporation, with respect to certain workers compensation and employers liability policies issued to Hoechst for the policy periods of 1989 and 1990. The court found that United had unequivocally assumed Reliance’s direct coverage obligations to Hoechst, that Hoechst had consented to this direct payment and released Reliance for all related claims, and that permitting such direct payment complied with the Section 534 of Article V of the Pennsylvania Insurance Department Act of 1921, the court’s own guidelines for enforcement of the Act, and the applicable reinsurance agreement.

In re Reliance Insurance Company, No. 1 REL 2001 (Pa. Comm. Ct. Nov. 22, 2016 )

This post written by Jason Brost.

See our disclaimer.

Filed Under: Reorganization and Liquidation

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • Page 18
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 107
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.