• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Archives for Reinsurance Regulation

Reinsurance Regulation

SEC settles claims against MBIA for sham reinsurance

February 8, 2007 by Carlton Fields

The SEC has filed a Complaint against MBIA in District Court alleging securities fraud arising out of an allegedly sham reinsurance transaction in 2005, which MBIA had entered into to avoid having to recognize a $170 million loss on bonds guaranteed by MBIA. The SEC simultaneously commenced an administrative enforcement proceeding against MBIA and entered an agreed cease and desist Order settling the dispute. A SEC litigation release describes these events, and the underlying conduct by MBIA.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

Special Focus: captive insurer bills

January 29, 2007 by Carlton Fields

With January comes the new sessions of most state legislatures. We have been reviewing the new bills filed in the state legislatures relating to reinsurance. There is one clear trend: many state legislators wish to provide for the creation and regulation of captive insurance/reinsurance companies in their states, or to amend existing rules relating to captives. While it is, of course, impossible to predict how many of the filed bills will be enacted into law, here is a sampling of the captive bills filed so far:

  • Arizona: HB 2294 (adding new provisions relating to captives);
  • Connecticut: Bill 58 (formation and licensing of captives) and Bill 60 (establishing a captive insurance division within the Insurance Department) (the full text of these bills is not available as of this posting);
  • Hawaii: HB 272 (allowing captives to be formed as limited liability companies, specifying minimum capital and surplus requirements and increasing investment flexibility);
  • Indiana: HB 1417 (specifying the requirements for a captive to do business in Indiana, imposing fees and premium taxes and establishing a captive insurer trust fund);
  • Missouri: SB 215 (amending the existing statutes to add 25 new sections relating to the regulation of captives – bill summary);
  • Montana: SB 161 (broad revision of statutory regulation of captives);
  • Nebraska: LB 121 (Captives Insurers Act);
  • New Jersey: SB 1444 (broad regulation of captives); and
  • West Virginia: SB 93 (adding three new sections relating to captives).

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Special Focus, Week's Best Posts

Florida Governor signs new hurricane preparedness and insurance bill into law

January 26, 2007 by Carlton Fields

New Florida Governor Charlie Crist has signed his first bill into law, House Bill 1A from a special session of the Florida Legislature dealing with insurance rates for homeowners. One of the principal goals of the special session was to increase the availability and lower the cost of homeowners insurance, particularly in coastal areas. A House of Representatives staff analysis of the bill contains background information about the insurance market in Florida and the impact of the eight major hurricanes that hit Florida during the 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons. The staff analysis reports that claims payments were made relating to the eight hurricanes totaling $33,346,477,364, and describes the resulting impact on the number of insurers writing homeowners coverage in the state, the cost of coverage and the cost of reinsurance.

This 176 page bill makes extensive changes to the Florida property insurance and reinsurance markets. The changes are summarized in the staff analysis. Among the changes is expanding the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund to provide a “temporary emergency program” for the 2007, 2008 and 2009 hurricane seasons providing less expensive reinsurance for insurers. Savings from the reduced cost of reinsurance must be passed on to consumers. It is unclear what the impact of this new law will be on the reinsurance market, but a large amount of reinsurance premium may now be diverted from the private reinsurance market to the public avenues set up or modified in this bill.

Filed Under: Industry Background, Reinsurance Regulation, Special Focus, Week's Best Posts

Delaware proposes regulations for managed care organizations

January 25, 2007 by Carlton Fields

Delaware has proposed regulations to implement the transfer of regulatory authority over managed care organizations from the Department of Health and Social Services to the Department of Insurance. The regulations include a requirement that each managed care organization secure reinsurance to cover catastrophic or unusual losses which would be in excess of the levels of loss which the organization assumes in the basis of its calculation of premium charges. A public hearing on the proposed regulations has been noticed for February 26, 2007. Delaware Proposed Regulation 1403.

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation

New York adopts new regulations for insurance reserves

January 23, 2007 by Carlton Fields

The New York Department of Insurance has adopted revised regulations governing the valuation of individual and group accident and health insurance reserves and emergency regulations governing the valuation of life insurance reserves. The complete re-writing of the reserve requirements relating to accident and health insurance was the first revision of the regulations in that area since 1971. The changes include a change from the use of the 1964 Commissioners' Disability Tables to the 1986 tables, and the adoption, for the first time, of regulations for group insurance. The emergency regulations for life insurance were adopted due to the Department becoming aware that “some insurers have designed certain life insurance products with the clear intent of circumventing existing reserve standards.”

Filed Under: Reinsurance Regulation, Week's Best Posts

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 98
  • Page 99
  • Page 100
  • Page 101
  • Page 102
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 107
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.