• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Arbitration / Court Decisions / Confirmation / Vacation of Arbitration Awards / ARBITRATION ROUND-UP

ARBITRATION ROUND-UP

January 3, 2013 by Carlton Fields

Evident Partiality, Fraud, Corruption, Undue Means

Dubois v. Macy’s Retail Holdings, Inc., Case No. 11-4904 (USDC E.D.N.Y. Sept. 13, 2012) (accepting magistrate’s report and recommendation denying motion to vacate, no corruption, fraud, undue means, or evident partiality; granting motion to confirm)

Burbach Aquatics, Inc. v. Huntley Illinois Park District, Case No. 12-6613 (USDC N.D. Ill Nov. 21, 2012) (denying motion to vacate, no evident partiality, no manifest disregard of the law)

Gambino v. Alfonso Electrical Services, Case No. 10-10860 (USDC D. Mass. Nov. 20, 2012) (granting motion to vacate, evident partiality where arbitrator owed fiduciary duty as trustee to prevailing party)

Failure or Refusal to Hear Material Evidence

Allstate Ins. Co. v. GEICO, No. D36443 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 9, 2012) (reversing trial court decision granting motion to vacate for failure or refusal to hear evidence, reinstating and confirming award)

Exeeding Scope of Submission

Integrated Construction Enterprises, Inc. v. Bradley Sciocchetti, Inc., No. A-2511-10T4 (N.J. App. Div. Nov. 20, 2012) (affirming denial of vacatur, arbitrator did not exceed powers by awarding prevailing party costs associated with arbitration, no evident mathematical error in damages award)

Arbitration Procedure

OneBeacon America Insurance Co. v. Swiss Reinsurance America Corp., Case No. 12-5043 (USDC S.D.N.Y. Oct. 19, 2012) (granting petition for appointment of neutral third arbitrator for tri-partite panel)

Hofer Builders, Inc. v. Captstone Building Corp., Case No. 12-1367 (USDC E.D. La. Nov. 20, 2012) (denying interlocutory motion to vacate arbitrator decision denying summary judgment, as decision did not constitute a “final award”)

Oakley Fertilizer, Inc. v. Hagrpota for Trading & Distribution, Ltd., Case No. 11-7799 (USDC S.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2012) (granting motion to confirm award under Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards and the FAA, where losing party in arbitration was refusing to pay award)

Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. Jai Shree Navdurga, LLC, Case No. 11-2893 (USDC D. Md. Nov. 29, 2012) (confirming award by default judgment, denying motion for costs not pled in initial complaint)

This post written by John Pitblado.

See our disclaimer.

Filed Under: Confirmation / Vacation of Arbitration Awards

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.