• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Reinsurance Focus

New reinsurance-related and arbitration developments from Carlton Fields

  • About
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Treaty Tips
    • Special Focus
    • Market
  • Contact
  • Exclusive Content
    • Blog Staff Picks
    • Cat Risks
    • Regulatory Modernization
    • Webinars
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Arbitration / Court Decisions / Arbitration Process Issues / SIXTH CIRCUIT HOLDS PIZZA HUT FRANCHISEE WAIVED ARBITRATION RIGHT

SIXTH CIRCUIT HOLDS PIZZA HUT FRANCHISEE WAIVED ARBITRATION RIGHT

October 19, 2015 by John Pitblado

The world’s largest Pizza Hut franchisee, NPC International, Inc. (“NPC”), which operates more than 1200 Pizza Hut restaurants in the United States, was sued in federal district court by employees in five separate collective action lawsuits for alleged unpaid “off the clock” work, meeting, and training time. The district court found that the defendant employer’s litigation actions waived its contractual right to insist on arbitration of employees’ claims for unpaid compensation by failing to assert timely the right. The district court accordingly denied NPC’s motion to compel arbitration in all five cases. NPC appealed.

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed, concluding that NPC had “slept on its rights” by waiting almost fifteen months before raising the arbitration issue in any of the five cases. Further, it was only after NPC obtained unfavorable rulings on its initial dispositive motions that it moved to dismiss or compel arbitration. Finally, NPC’s belated assertion of its right to arbitration caused plaintiffs actual prejudice in the form of unnecessary delay and expense.

Gunn v. NPC Int’l, Inc., Nos. 14-6036/6040/6041/6042/6044 (6th Cir. Aug. 28, 2015).

This post written by Whitney Fore, a law clerk at Carlton Fields in Washington, DC.

See our disclaimer.

Filed Under: Arbitration Process Issues, Week's Best Posts

Primary Sidebar

Carlton Fields Logo

A blog focused on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Focused Topics

Hot Topics

Read the results of Artemis’ latest survey of reinsurance market professionals concerning the state of the market and their intentions for 2019.

Recent Updates

Market (1/27/2019)
Articles (1/2/2019)

See our advanced search tips.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive updates to Reinsurance Focus® by email, visit our Subscription page.
© 2008–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · Disclaimers and Conditions of Use

Reinsurance Focus® is a registered service mark of Carlton Fields. All Rights Reserved.

Please send comments and questions to the Reinsurance Focus Administrators

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.